PS

How we score

Every project on PropertyScore is evaluated on three independent pillars. The overall score is a weighted composite; each pillar itself is composed from multiple factual and editorial signals.

Overall score formula

Overall = 0.40 × Location + 0.30 × Developer + 0.30 × Planning

Each pillar is scored on a 0–10 scale, rounded to one decimal place for display.

Pillars

Location (40%)

Micro-market maturity, connectivity to arterial roads and highways, proximity to schools, healthcare, retail and transit, and future infrastructure that is officially announced (not speculation).

Developer (30%)

Track record: number of completed projects, on-time delivery history, structural quality, RERA complaints, transparency in dealings, and years in the market.

Planning (30%)

Site layout, tower spacing, light and ventilation, amenity mix, unit efficiency, safety and access design, and quality of clubhouse and open spaces.

Confidence labels

Source hierarchy

  1. Regulatory: GujRERA project record, AUDA/GUDA planning approvals, municipal filings.
  2. Developer: official brochure and website (used for facts, not for editorial claims).
  3. Independent: reputed news outlets, court judgements, industry reports.
  4. Editorial: our field notes, developer conversations and site visits.

Review cadence

Every project record has a "Last reviewed" date shown on the page. Under-construction projects are re-reviewed at least once every 90 days; ready-to-move projects less frequently. Any factual issue submitted through Contact & Corrections is investigated within 7 working days.

What we intentionally exclude

We do not publish any pricing, budget bands, per-sq-ft rates, exact carpet areas or "best deal" language. These are commercial signals that vary by inventory, negotiation and time; publishing them on a scoring platform creates conflicts of interest we do not want to entertain.

About PropertyScore →Editorial policy →Browse all projects →